Essay on Negotiating with Terrorists Encourages More...

One assumption made about terrorism is that you shouldn’t, or can’t, negotiate with terrorists because it will only incite more violence and encourage further terrorism. Many people have made this claim, from politicians to leading scholars in the field. At the height of terrorist activity from the Irish Republican Army, the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher vowed to never negotiate with terrorists. Likewise, after the 9/11 attacks in America, President George Bush vowed to never negotiate with terrorists because it would only encourage them towards more violence. Similar claims have been made by many world leaders, including leaders from Turkey, Spain, and Columbia. But world leaders aren’t the only ones who make this claim. Paul†¦show more content†¦You can’t say that negotiations will work in every case, but likewise you can’t say that they will never work either. Governments need to study this and consider how to go about negotia tions without weakening their position or setting dangerous precedents that lead to further terrorist activities. It is important to consider that not all situations are the same and not all terrorists are the same. Should there be blanket policies against negotiating with terrorists? Are some situations conducive to negotiations? History has shown us examples that support this assumption and examples that reject the assumption as well. The current situation with Al Qaida would support the assumption that negotiations would not work and that there would be further terrorist activity. Al Qaida’s ideology is not in line with ours. It is anti-western and very religious in nature. Negotiations would be very difficult, if not impossible, for both sides. Negotiating with them could mean running the risk of legitimizing their actions. Making it further difficult is that many terrorists within this organization believe that violence is a path to a religious afterlife so are not likely to stop their actions.[4] Let’s consider an example that would discredit the assumption. Michael Ignatieff, a scholar on the subject of terrorism, stated that terrorists may have valid claims even though the means of obtaining their goals are unacceptable. He further states that by negotiating with them, youShow MoreRelatedGovernment Should Not Negotiate with Terrorist Essay823 Words   |  4 PagesNegotiate with Terrorist   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Many countries have policies which pledge to not negotiate terrorists yet negotiating are still occurs behind the scene. Negotiating is to reach to an agreement through discussing formally with others but terrorists by definition is someone you disagree with. So negotiating with them to make an agreement is nonviable. In 2003, President George W. Bush proclaimed that â€Å"You have got to be strong, not weak. The only way to deal with these people [terrorists] is to bringRead MoreThe Argument Against Negotiating With Terrorists913 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The argument against negotiating with terrorists is simple: Democracies must never give in to violence†1. This for the most part is the official line of most western liberal democracies. The policy of negotiating with terrorists give legitimacy top these violent groups and undermine the actions and methods of other groups who have pursued political change thr ough peaceful means. Peace talks with terrorists can, and have, destabilized the negotiations and undercut international efforts to haltRead MoreCounter Terrorism Policy of the Un1925 Words   |  8 PagesTerrorism is an act of violence, usually done in the public sphere, which is used to incite fear in a population in order to coerce change in public opinion or a government’s position on an issue. In many parts of the world, groups wage war with their countries, either to separate from the government or to overthrow it entirely. Sometimes these people are treated unfairly by their government, and their struggles are justified. Other times, these groups use violence against both military and civilianRead MoreSignificance Of Iran s Nuclear Program And Show How Other Countries React And Are Affected By It1875 Words   |  8 Pages2013). Why is Iran the home of terrorism? Since the beginning of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran is known to be the world’s most vigorous benefactor of terrorism. Tehran, which is the capital of Iran, has supplied, financed, and inspired violent groups over the years. Iran has sponsored not only members in the Persian Gulf, but also terrorists and radicals in Lebanon. The Palestinians have never participated in any armed attack against anyone. The terrorists and radicals in Lebanon, the PalestinianRead MoreThe United States Vs. The Warsaw Pact1952 Words   |  8 Pagesadvent of the technological and information revolutions has spurred nuclear capabilities to new borders. In addition, new economic integration has given higher incentives for countries to share the new capabilities with trading partners. Even nuclear terrorism is debated to be maybe the most significant threat. Thus, globalization is simultaneously causing the spread and disbarment of nuclear weapons. Can global non-proliferation initiatives over come the globalization of nuclear weapons? The years ofRead MoreWar Between Afghanistan And America1601 Words   |  7 Pagesis at war with Afghanistan. For the last 14 year America has sent its troops to Afghanistan, and in doing so America has lost a lot of money and has now lost its purpose in continuing the war. The war started after a terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, to fight against terrorist groups that were responsible for the attack. American leaders never realized this would be the longer war in American history. The withdrawal of the Troops in Afghanistan is not a new topic. American citizens are splitRead MoreThe United States And The Middle East1245 Words   |  5 Pages For much of the United States’ history, affairs in the Middle East have been an important focus. A more recent example is President Barack Obama attempting to deal with the terrorist organization, ISIS, because they are threatening the security of American allies. In the past, multiple other presidents have intervened in Middle Eastern affairs because they believe that doing so would be in the best interest of the United States. The importance of Middle Eastern affairs to the United States duringRead MoreThe Current Administration s Theory Of International Relations Essay1913 Words   |  8 PagesCommencement Address the President asserted two points. The first is that â€Å"technology and globalization has put power once reserved for states in the hands of individuals raising the capacity of terrorists to do harm.† Additionally, he argued that â€Å"the most direct threat to America at home and abroad remains terrorism.† These are both key concepts of the Liberalism theory. As a Liberalism proponent, the President supports the sharing of technology and other advances that will improve lives around theRead MoreThe Activism Towards The German Unification1512 Words   |  7 Pagesneed today in our society. The modern racial clashes we have (police brutality, assassinations in African American churches) need to be addressed not only socially but politically, and bringing back Schulz’s work during the Reconstruction might encourage our politicians to actually do the work instead of bombarding us with pure rhetoric. Schulz, and many men like him, might be what precisely the United States needs today. Starting point: Germany The most staggering characteristic of this man whoRead MoreMoral And Religious Education Help Fight Corruption With A Sovereign Country2100 Words   |  9 Pagescombatted with religious and moral education and by eliminating opportunities by doing away with rules that can encourage corrupt behavior. In other words, to be successful in fighting corruption within a sovereign country, the country needs to make deep cultural and structural changes. But is there any proof that shows that an increase in moral and religious education and creating a more religious culture will actually fight corruption? Mr. Là ³pez Claros has control over the bylaws that are institutionalized